Skip to content
  • Menu
  • About

    About HRI

    HRI is a leading non-governmental organisation working to reduce the negative health, social and human rights impacts of drug use and drug policy by promoting evidence-based public health policies and practices, and human rights based approaches to drugs. Read more about HRI’s history.

    Vision and Mission

    Our vision is a world in which individuals and communities benefit from drug laws, policies and practices that promote health, dignity and human rights.

    Staff

    Meet our staff at HRI

    Governance

    HRI is governed by a nine person Board of Directors, elected for three-year terms of office by our membership at our Annual General Meetings. Read more about HRI governance.

    News and Announcements

    Read the latest announcements and updates from HRI.

    What is harm reduction?

    Harm reduction refers to policies, programmes and practices that aim to reduce the harms associated with the use of psychoactive drugs in people unable or unwilling to stop. The defining features are the focus on the prevention of harm, rather than on the prevention of drug use itself, and the focus on people who continue to use drugs.

    Harm reduction definition and principles in 11 languages

    Contact Us

    Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions or queries about our website, our work, membership or the international harm reduction conference.

    Donors

    HRI benefits from the generous support of the Open Society Foundations, the European Commission, the Elton John AIDS Foundation, the MAC AIDS Fund, UNAIDS, the World Health Organization, the UN Office on Drugs and Crime, the World Bank, The Robert Carr Networks Fund and the Swiss Government.

    Harm Reduction International Awards

    HRI presents a number of awards at outr international conference to acknowledge the contributions of outstanding groups or individuals in the field.

  • Our Work

    Evidence for advocacy

    HRI produces groundbreaking research and policy analysis informing advocacy across our sector.

    Spending where it matters

    Funding for harm reduction services is dangerously short while billions are wasted on drug enforcement. HRI works to assess resourcing needs and advocates for a reinvestment in health.

    Human rights-based policy

    Human rights abuses and drug enforcement go hand in hand. HRI challenges laws, policies and practices that generate harm.

    Sector strengthening

    HRI builds advocacy coalitions and supports emerging harm reduction networks to strengthen the international harm reduction sector.

    International conference

    Harm reduction is a global movement. Our biennial gathering is the International Harm Reduction Conference, convened by HRI.

  • Global State of Harm Reduction

    Global State of Harm Reduction

    Our flagship publication is the biennial Global State of Harm Reduction report. First published in 2008, it involves a coordinated effort across practitioners, academics, advocates and activists to map global data and responses to HIV and hepatitis C epidemics related to unsafe injecting and non-injecting drug use. It is the only report to provide an independent analysis of the state of harm reduction in the world. The information collated within the report is stored and regularly updated on an interactive e-tool for researchers and advocates.

    The Global State of Harm Reduction report is supplemented by regular thematic reports and advisories on key issues and emerging challenges. Please search our Resource Library for more information or join our e-list for regular updates.

    Interactive e-tool

    Global State of Harm Reduction’ e-tool is an interactive resource containing up-to-date information on harm reduction policy and programming around the world. Users can select countries or regions and create tables for an at-a-glance guide to the current state of harm reduction worldwide.

  • International Conferences

    International Conferences

    The 24th International Harm Reduction Conference 2015 will take place in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 18–21 October, 201

    Sign up for e-updates or visit the website regularly for more information.

    You can still access the 2013 conference site for an idea of what to expect.

    Conference Archive

    Explore past international harm reduction conferences dating back to 2000.

  • Resource Library

    Resource Library

    Use our extensive resource library to search for HRI, NGO and academic reports, articles and presentations, including materials from past international conferences.

    Harm Reduction Journal

    Harm Reduction Journal, www.harmreductionjournal.com, is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal whose focus is on the prevalent patterns of psychoactive drug use, the public policies meant to control them, and the search for effective methods of reducing the adverse medical, public health, and social consequences associated with both drugs and drug policies.

  • Support Us

    Membership & Donations

    HRI is a membership based organisation with over 8,000 members worldwide. Read more about individual and organisational membership here.

    We rely on trusts, grants, membership fees and donations to continue our work. To make a donation or pay membership fees, please use our secure payment page.

    Or why not fundraise for us with ‘Discover Adventure’?

    Contact Us

    Harm Reduction International
    Unit 2C09 Southbank Technopark
    90 London Road
    London
    SE1 6LN  

    Tel: +44(0) 207 717 1592
    Fax: +44 (0) 207 922 8822
    Email: info@ihra.net
    Join us on facebook at: Harm Reduction International
    Or join us on Twitter at: HRInews

    E-Updates

    Sign up to receive email updates, report launches, harm reduction advisories and information about the forthcoming international harm reduction conference

Executing arrest warrants: Interpol, the UN and the death penalty

Date: 16 February 2012

  • Print
  • Bookmark and Share

This comment was posted today on Huffington Post UK

Last Friday, Malaysian Police confirmed the arrest of Hamza Kashgari, a journalist wanted by Saudi Arabia for insulting the Prophet Mohamed on Twitter. The arrest reportedly came after Interpol issued a ‘Red Notice’ on the request of Saudi Arabia (an ‘international alert allowing police in member countries to share critical crime-related information’). Kashgari has since been returned to the country where he faces the death penalty.

Interpol denied involvement, a spokesperson stating said: ‘The assertion that Saudi Arabia used Interpol's system in this case is wholly misleading and erroneous.’

That may be true but the Kashgari case serves as a window into a far bigger legal and moral problem for Interpol.

According to the agency, ‘In the case of Red Notices, the persons concerned are wanted by national jurisdictions and the notices requested are based on an arrest warrant or court decision. Interpol's role is to assist the national police forces in identifying and locating these persons with a view to their arrest and extradition’

6,344 Red Notices were issued in 2010.

But Interpol cannot do this in a legal or moral vacuum. According to its own constitution, its foundational legal document, one of Interpol’s aims is ‘To ensure and promote the widest possible mutual assistance between all criminal police authorities within the limits of the laws existing in the different countries and in the spirit of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights’.

Article 3 of the constitution is Interpol’s neutrality clause, barring action in religious cases, so a case like that of Kashgari would be clear cut. Interpol should not act. But what about actual crimes that carry the death penalty in many countries in contravention of international law, such as economic crimes and drug offences? What is Interpol’s position on assisting the capture and extradition of people who will face death for such crimes?

Searching current Red Notices on Interpol’s website, 13 have been issued for people wanted in China for corruption, for example, which can carry a death sentence (among other economic crimes).

On a larger scale, up to a thousand people are likely put to death every year for drug offences. There are 160 Red Notices issued for ‘drugs’, with people wanted by Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore, China, Viet Nam, Iran and other states that retain the death penalty for drug offences.

There are eight notices for people wanted by Saudi Arabia for drug offences. Since 2007, Saudia Arabia has executed at least 65 people for drugs. China and Viet Nam are secretive about their executions, but both are known to be prolific.

Aside from international notices there is training, capacity building and operations. One of the agency’s most prominent current drugs programmes is ‘Operation Ice Trail’, intended to ‘target organized crime groups trafficking huge quantities of methamphetamine by courier and/or cargo shipment from Iran via Turkey to destination countries in Southeast Asia and the Pacific’. In other words, drugs originating in a death penalty state and destined for a region replete with them.

Iran executed around 590 people for drugs in 2010, and well over 10,000 since 1979.  In January, Interpol hosted the third operational working group meeting on Operation Ice Trail in Tehran, attended by police forces from eleven countries.

The UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) was also represented, and it is an agency that has recently also been criticised for assisting death penalty states in capturing drug suspects.  UNODC assistance to Iran, China and elsewhere has led to prosecutions and executions. Such programmes are ongoing despite concerns being raised by human rights groups.

The two agencies are strikingly similar. Both are international agencies involved heavily in drug enforcement. Both work with countries with extremely poor human rights records. Both have human rights as core values, at least on paper.

The answers are also similar. Both need clear, developed, and published human rights frameworks to guide their actions. They need transparent systems of human rights risk and impact assessment to implement those guidelines and against which they can be held to account. This applies to technical assistance, capacity building, material assistance, and, of course, if and when Interpol issues Red Notices.

Recently the Thai Deputy Prime Minister Chalerm Yubumrung has announced plans to cut appeal processes for those on death row for drug offences in Thailand, aiming to expedite executions. There are over 300 people on death row for drugs in Thailand, meaning that Mr Chalerm is proposing a lot of killing in the near future, it seems. How should this affect Interpol’s decision making?

As a first step, clear, public, red lines for when assistance cannot be provided must be developed. Syria is an Interpol member. Would Interpol now issue a Red Notice on request from the Assad regime for any crime?

Interpol may not have been involved in Hamza Kashgari’s capture. But the process of Red Notices for warrants that may result in execution raises a range of questions that must be answered by Interpol, UNODC and donors to such agencies. We cannot have international policing without human rights oversight.The answer to that should be clearer than it is.

Interpol may not have been involved in Hamza Kashgari's capture. But the process of Red Notices for warrants that may result in executions raises a range of questions that must be answered by Interpol, as well as other international drug enforcement agencies such as UNODC and their donors (especially those that have abolished the death penalty).

We cannot have international policing without human rights oversight.

blog comments powered by Disqus