Rahat Fateh Ali Khan, a prominent Pakistani singer, recently came under intense scrutiny after a viral video depicted him hitting a man, Naveed Hasnain, with a shoe. The incident ignited a backlash on social media. However, Rahat addressed the controversy, disclosing that he had indeed apologized to Naveed, whom he considers to be his protege. This revelation came during a podcast conversation with Adeel Asif, where Rahat explained his perspective on the incident and attempted to offer clarification.
The singer asserted that he had adopted a paternal role in Naveed’s life, emphasizing the significance of his position as a mentor and teacher, and justified his actions within the context of their relationship. He also brought attention to the fact that the incident revolved around a bottle, later clarified to be “pir sahab ka dum ka paani” (holy water), intimating that the severity of the situation may have been misconstrued by the public.
Despite Rahat’s attempt to provide context and his assertion that the episode was an internal matter, the video had already incited widespread criticism and ridicule online. Rahat expressed his dismay over the public’s reaction, suggesting that the gravity of the situation, particularly in its connection to his spiritual guide, had been overlooked.
In a separate video, Rahat further addressed the issue, stating that the person who recorded the video had intentions to tarnish his image, and reiterated that the occurrence was a private matter between himself and his employee. Moreover, he emphasized the norm of rewarding and disciplining proteges based on their conduct, reflecting the dynamics of their mentor-protege relationship.
The episode raises questions about the boundaries between mentorship and discipline in a professional setting, as well as the repercussions of such incidents in the age of social media and instant viral circulation.
Overall, the incident involving Rahat Fateh Ali Khan has sparked a conversation about appropriate behavior and conduct in mentor-mentee relationships and the impact of public perception in the digital age.
➤# What was the viral video incident involving Rahat Fateh Ali Khan?
In a viral video, Rahat Fateh Ali Khan was seen hitting a man, Naveed Hasnain, with a shoe, resulting in significant online criticism and backlash.
➤# How did Rahat respond to the criticism over the incident?
Rahat addressed the incident, explaining that he had apologized to Naveed, whom he considers his protege. He emphasized the paternal role he plays in Naveed’s life and underscored the internal nature of their relationship. Additionally, he highlighted that the incident revolved around a bottle, later clarified to be “pir sahab ka dum ka paani” (holy water), and expressed disappointment over the public’s response.
➤# What did Rahat clarify about the incident?
Rahat called the incident an ‘internal matter’ between a master and his employee, emphasizing that the person who recorded the video had intentions to tarnish his image. He also emphasized the norm of rewarding and disciplining proteges based on their conduct, reflecting the dynamics of their mentor-protege relationship.
Rahat Fateh Ali Khan’s response to the incident underscores the complexities of mentor-mentee relationships and the challenges of navigating public perception in the digital age. His attempt to provide context and explanation has generated discussions about appropriate conduct and professionalism in such relationships, while also prompting reflections on the impact of social media scrutiny.